Does Islam mean ‘Peace’ like many ‘Modern Daees’ claim?

Assalamualaikum wa rahmatulahi wa barakatuhu,

Nahmaduhu wa nusalli ala rasoolihil kareem, Amma baad,

Modern apologist daees in their efforts to show that Islam is peaceful go to the limits of literally translating ‘Islam’ as ‘peace’.

One famous daee also translated the ayah 3:19,

“Inna addeena inda Allahil-islam”

as

“The only religion accepted in the sight of Allah is Peace”…

(Zakir Naik in his debate with Sri Sri Ravishankar)

I got this from Shaikh Jamaal al-Din M.Zarabozo’s ‘Commentary on The Forty Hadith’ Vol.1,page 164.

He(hafidhaullah) writes when commenting on the Hadith-Jibreel,the 2nd hadith of Arbain an-Nawawi about the ‘meaning of Islam’:

Lexically speaking Islam means submission.In its particular sense related to the religion of Islam,Nomani wrote,

Literally,Islam denotes self-surrender or to give oneself up to someone and accept his overlordship in the fullest sense of the term.
(End Quote)

So Islam by itself means submitting your will to the commands of Allah and not Peace.

May Allah guide us to the books of the true scholars and keep us away from misguided individuals who try to distort Islam so that it suits the taste of the masses.Aameen.

(Copied from my old Facebook account)

22nd July 2014

Refuting A ‘Modernist Hadeeth Rejector’ Daee- Khurshid Imam

As-Salamualaikum…

Alhamdulillah.Nahmadulhu wa nusalli ala rasulihil kareem….Amma Ba’ad…

Please be careful before listening to any speaker or calling him to your religious seminars,a speaker who I once thought was a follower of the Quran and Sunnah,had a set of absurd notes he uploaded on Facebook which had the obnoxious smell of ‘Modernists and Hadeeth Rejectors’.And this guy is presently in the company of other ‘Quran and Sunnah’ Duaat and ‘Islamic Writers’ who wont refute him simply for the sake of unity,even if it is at the cost of destroying Islam.

Some of his nonsense…

(1)(He implies that it is haram to marry Ahlul-Kitaab women) Quote:
“Combining both ayah we realize that ONLY those women from people of the book are lawful for marriage who are NOT mushrik.”…”or such things that makes her msuhrik then marriage with such ladies is NOT AT ALL allowed.”

Answer.It is preferable not to marry Ahlul-Kitaab women,but it is basically halal.

(Quran 5:5)-….And [lawful in marriage are] chaste women from among the believers and chaste women from among those who were given the Scripture before you,…(part of the ayah)

Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “If the woman of the people of the Book is known to be chaste and to keep away from the means that lead to immorality, it is permissible, because Allaah has permitted that and has permitted us to marry their woman and eat their meat.

“But nowadays there is the fear that those who marry them may be faced with much evil. They may call him to their religion and that may lead to their children being raised as Christians. So the danger is very real and very serious. To be on the safe side, the believer should not marry them. And in most cases there is no guarantee that the woman will not commit immoral actions, or bring along children from a previous relationship… but if the man needs to do that then there is no sin on him, so that he can keep himself chaste and lower his gaze by being married to her. He should strive to call her to Islam and beware of her evil and of allowing her to drag him or the children towards kufr.”

Fataawa Islamiyyah, 3/172

(2)(He disagrees that verses of The Quran can be abrogated)Quote: “All arguments given in favor of abrogation are extremely bogus-can not go down well to any honest and logical person.”

(Quran 2:106)We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?

Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan as-Sa‘di (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Naskh (abrogation) means moving; thus the meaning of abrogation is moving those who are accountable from one prescribed ruling to another, or waiving the ruling. The Jews used to condemn abrogation and claim that it was not permissible, even though it was referred to in the Torah; thus their rejection of it constituted disbelief and was based on pure whims and desires. Tafseer as-Sa‘di, p. 61

(3)(There is no death for an apostate) Quote: “Quran gives absolute freedom of belief / disbelief. None can be forced to believe in Islam. None can be threatened with death for leaving Islam”.

On the authority of Ibn Mas’ood (radiAllaahu anhu) who said : The Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said :It is not permissible to spill the blood of a Muslim except in three [instances] : the married person who commits adultery, a life for a life, and the one who forsakes his religion(*) and separates from the community.
(It was related by al-Bukhaaree and Muslim.)

*the one who forsakes his religion(*A Muslim who apostatizes)

(4)(His Quranist-Hadees rejecting manhaj)Quote: “Life is extremely scared in Islam; a crime that deserves death has to be stated in Quran clearly.”..”When Almighty God mentions about various crimes and its punishment – some even less severe than death; for example – cutting off hands for theft, flogging for wrong accusation of zina – then how come Allah will leave it to hadees to explain a crime and the punishment that is more severe?”

Narrated Al-Irbad ibn Sariyah as-Sulami: (Part of the hadith)…”Does any of you, while reclining on his couch, imagine that Allah has prohibited only that which is to be found in this Qur’an? By Allah, I have preached, commanded and prohibited various matters as numerous as that which is found in the Qur’an, or more numerous….” Sunan Abu Dawud Book #19, Hadith #3044.

Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: ‘Umar said, “I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, “We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,” and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession.” Sufyan added, “I have memorized this narration in this way.” ‘Umar added, “Surely Allah’s Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.” Sahih Bukhari Book #82, Number #816.

(5)(Tries playing with hadees even though he is a jahil in this science) Quote : ” A very few hadees that gives idea that apostate should be killed is full of contradiction and have several flaws.”

Imam al-Barbaharee (rahimahullah), ‘If you hear a man criticizing the narrations, not accepting them or rejecting any of the narrations from the Messenger of Allah , doubt his Islam since he is a person having a despicable opinion and saying. He is indeed attacking the Messenger of Allah and his companions, since we have only come to know of Allah, His Messenger , the Qur’aan, what is good and bad and of this world and the Hereafter through the narrations.’ [Sharhus-Sunnah by Imam Barbaharee (point no: 69)]

(6)(A quote from his erroneous essay “Lost Prophets of India”) Quote: (After misinterpreting the Quran and Hadees) “Can Prophet Noah be prophet of Hindus? Prophet Noah has to be prophet of the oldest community or one of the oldest communities.”

Answer: No where does Allah mention that Noah (Alaihissalaam) was a Messenger of Hindus. The Quran just says that Allah has sent prophets to every community, but it did not mention any name for India.

(*)There are many things I could refute from him,but what I have quoted is enough for any sane minded Muslim,In’Sha’Allah.

“Oh, soon a time will come when a narration of mines will reach a person while he is relaxing on his couch. He will say, ‘We have the word of Allah (Qurān) to judge between us; what we find as permissible in there, we will regard that as permissible and we would regard as impermissible what we find prohibited in the Qurān.’ (Then Nabi صلي الله عليه وسلم said), ‘Verily the prohibition of the messenger صلي الله عليه وسلم is same like the prohibition of Allah.” (Sunan at-Tirmidhi 5/38)

“When I prohibit you from an action then avoid it, and when I order you (to do something), do as much of it as you can.” (Sahīh al-Bukhāri 6/2658 and Muslim 4/102)

Shaykh Abdul Azeez Ibn Baaz (رحمة اللہ علیه) said,

“The denial of the sunnah… And rendering it inapplicable is an act of kufr and apostasy due to the fact that whoever denies the sunnah actually denies the Qur’aan and whoever denies either or both of them is a disbeliever according to all of the schools of thought in Islaam.’

(In Defense of the Qur’an and Sunnah (Majlis al-Haq Publication Society, Canada), p. 5. Cf., ‘Abdul ‘Azeez Ibn Baaz, Wujoob al-Amal bi Sunnat ar-Rasool wa Kufr man Inkaaraha (Riyadh: Shaarikah at-Taba al-Arabiya as-Saudiya, 1400 A.H.), pp. 13-14; as quoted in The Authority and Importance of the Sunnah, p. 218 )

Ibn Battah (رحمة اللہ علیه) stated, “If a person believes in everything that the Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) brought except for one thing, and he rejects that thing, then he is a disbeliever according to all of the scholars.” (The Authority and Importance of the Sunnah, p. 219 )

(Copied from my old account on Facebook, editing left)

13th May 2014

Forgotten Sunnah Series-12

Dua when sighting new moon.

Bilal bin Yahya bin Talhah bin`Ubaidullah narrated : from his father, from his grandfather Talhah bin `Ubaidullah that when the Prophet (ﷺ) would see a crescent moon, he would say: “O Allah, bring it over us with blessing and faith, and security and Islam. My Lord and your Lord is Allah (Allāhumma ahlilhu `alainā bil-yumni wal-Īmān, was-salāmati wal-Islām, rabbī wa rabbuk Allāh).”
(Sunan At-Tirmidhi,3451)
[عن عبدالله بن عمر:]
كانَ رسولُ اللهِ إذا رأى الهلالَ قالَ:

اللهُ أكبرُ،
اللَّهمَّ أَهِلَّهُ علينا بالأمنِ والإيمانِ،
والسَّلامةِ والإسلامِ،

والتَّوفيقِ لما تحبُّ، وَترضَى، ربُّنا وربُّكَ اللهُ

الألباني (١٤٢٠ هـ)، الكلم الطيب ١٦٢ • صحيح بشواهده

Is it proven that Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنه) buried his daughters during the days of ignorance(Jahiliyyah)?

Question: I wanted to ask you about the authenticity of the story that states that Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنه) buried his daughters? I wish for an explanative answer.May Allah grant you Jannah and accept your good deeds.

Answer:

All praises and thanks be to Allah.

We can say for sure that the story concerning Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنه),that he buried his daughters during the Jahiliyyah, is void of any proof,and the reasons for that are:

1. Such stories have not been narrated in the books of Sunnah and Hadith, or the books of Athar (narrations of The Sahaba and other than them) and History, and we don’t know the origin of this story except from those who are liars from the Raafidah (extreme Shia),the haters (of the Sahaba), who speak without any proofs or evidences.

2. If the practice of burying daughters was widespread in Banu Adiyy (the clan of Umar ibn al-Khattab), then how was Hafsah bint Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنها) born in the days of Jahiliyyah,(and that too) five years before the beginning of the Prophetic mission, and she wasn’t buried!

This is a proof that burying daughters wasn’t from the qualities of Umar ibn al-Khattab in Jahiliyyah.

See the biography of Umm-ul-Mumineen Hafsah bint Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنها) in ‘Al-Isabah’ of Al-Hafidh ibn Hajr (7/582).

3. And what was related from Umar ibn al-Khattab about the practice of burying infant daughters, is the narration related by An-Numan bin Basheer (رضي الله عنه), that he said: ‘I heard Umar ibn al-Khattab, that he said: ‘That it was asked about the statement of Allah,”And when the (buried) female child will ask (for what crime was she buried) [At-Takwir:8]”‘, he (Umar) said: ‘Qais bin Aasim (رضي الله عنه) came to the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and he (Qais) said: “Oh Messenger of Allah! I had buried eight of my daughters in Jahiliyyah!”.He ﷺ replied: “Free a slave on behalf of each of them”, he (Qais) said: “I am an owner of camels?”, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: “Slaughter (a camel) on behalf of every girl (you buried)”[And in another narration: For every one if you wish (a camel)]”‘.

Narrated by Al-Bazzar (1/60), and At-Tabarani in his ‘Al-Mujam Al-Kabeer'(18/337), and Al-Haythmi said: ‘The men in the narration of Al-Bazzar are (men of) Saheeh except for Hussain bin Mahdi Al-Ailee and he is Thiqah (trustworthy)’. End quote.

Also in ‘Majmua Az-Zawaid'(7/283). Shaikh Al-Albani authenticated it in his ‘Silsilatul Ahadith As-Saheehah'(3298), where it is mentioned as a narration of Umar ibn al-Khattab (رضي الله عنه)- as an expiation for what passed by of burying daughters in Jahiliyyah, and Umar ibn al-Khattab did not mention anything similar as such about himself, and this has been narrated as an act done by Qais bin Aasim (رضي الله عنه) and it indicates that the incident alleged upon Umar ibn al-Khattab about burying daughters had never occurred.

4. And then if we assume that the narration mentioned is authentic, yet still,the action of the Jahiliyyah are forgiven, as Islam erases (of sins) what preceded it, and if Allah has forgiven shirk and the worshipping of idols, which many of the Sahaba were involved in during the days of ignorance, then how will Allah deal with the issue of burying of daughters? (of course He will forgive it).

Doctor Abdus Salaam bin Muhsin Aal-lesa said :

“And as for Umar (رضي الله عنه), it was mentioned about him, that he buried his daughters in the days of ignorance, and I didn’t find anything in this regard about Umar from the sources (of history and biography); but I found that the Ustaz Abbas Mahmoud Al-Uqad has pointed out (signalled) towards this is his book, ‘Abqariyyatu-Umar’ [p. 221] , that he said, the summary of which is…

“That he (Umar) was sitting with some of the Sahaba, that he laughed a little, then he cried, the ones present asked him (the reason for behaving as such); he said : during the days of ignorance, we created an idol of dough and we worshipped it, then we ate it, and this is the reason I laughed; as for (the reason of) me crying, it is because I had a daughter, I intended to bury her, I took her with me, and dug a hole for her, and she was dusting off (removing) the soil from my beard, and then I buried her.

And I (the author), strongly doubt the authenticity of this story, (because) that the practice of burying daughters was not a very common practice amongst the Arabs, and as such it wasn’t famous about Banu Adiyy (that they did so), and Fatima bin Al-Khattab (رضي الله عنها), Umar’s sister, lived amongst the family of Al-Khattab and Hafsah was his (Umar’s) elder daughter, and she is the one because of whom Umar was titled(by Kunniyah) Abu Hafs, and Hafsah was born five years before the beginning of the Prophetic mission and she wasn’t buried, so why(do we have) the allegations of burying the younger daughters.

And why was this report (story of Umar burying his daughters) interrupted and not narrated from any of her brothers and sisters and uncles or aunts”.End quote.

Dirasah Naqeedah Fi Al-Marwiyyaat Fi Shaksiyyah Umar ibn al Khattab wa Siyasah Al-Idariyyah.(112-1/111)

And Allah knows the best.

[The question above was posed to islamqa.info, the website run by Shaikh Muhammad Saalih Al-Munajjid Hafidhahullah, and the answer was only available in the Arabic language. It has been translated into the English language for the benefit of sincere students of The Seerah of The Prophet ﷺ and his Sahaba (رضي الله عنهم). Any mistakes in the translation are to be attributed to the translator alone,and rectifications in this regard will be highly appreciated, Barakallahufeekum.]

-Translated by Abu Muaaz Mohammed Manna,

18th Dhul-Hijjah 1439

https://islamqa.info/ar/132437