‘Imam Al-Ghazzali mentioned that fasting on the 27th of Rajab is virtuous’- Answering the doubt!

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين.

For any act of worship to be a part of the religion of Islam, it needs to be proven from The Quran and The Sunnah, by the Sunnah we mean authentic Ahadith.

The 5th Hadith in the Arbain of Imam An-Nawawi(*1) reads:

On the authority of the mother of the faithful, Aisha (رضي الله عنها), who said:

The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, “He who innovates something in this matter of ours (i.e., Islam) that is not of it will have it rejected (by Allah).”

[Bukhari & Muslim]

In another version in Muslim it reads: “He who does an act which we have not commanded, will have it rejected (by Allah).”

There is a narration from the virtuous Sahabi Abu Hurairah (رضي الله عنه) on the virtue of fasting on the 27th of Rajab. Imam Ibn Hajr Al-Asqalani Rahimahullah has declared that it is a weak narration.

[عن شهر بن حوشب:] عن أبي هريرةَ قال: مَنْ صام يومَ سبعٍ وعشرينَ من رجبٍ كُتبَ لهصيامُ ستِّينَ شهرًا وهو اليومُ الذي هبط فيه جبريلُ بالرِّسالةِ

On the authority of Shahr bin Showhab from Abu Hurairah (رضي الله عنه) that he said : Whoever fasts on the 27th on Rajab it will be written from him as if he fasted for sixty years and that is the day Jibreel came down with the revelation.

ابن حجر العسقلاني (٨٥٢ هـ)، تبيين العجب ٤٥ • موقوف ضعيف الإسناد
(Sunnah.one app used)

The above narration is the same one quoted by Imam Al-Ghazzali Rahimahullah in his book Ihya Al-Uloom Ad-Deen.

For more on this subject do read:

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/75394/fasting-in-the-month-of-rajab

Quoted from the link above:

Imam ibn Hajar(*2) said in Tabyeen al-‘Ajab (p. 11)

There is no saheeh hadeeth that would count as evidence which speaks of the virtue of the month of Rajab, or that speaks of fasting this month or part of it, or of spending any particular night of it in prayer. End quote.

If Imam Al-Ghazzali has used the above narration of Abu Hurairah (رضي الله عنه) in his book Ihya Uloom Ad-Deen, that doesn’t make the Hadith ‘authentic’. A Hadith is authentic only if it fulfills the criterion for being authentic. And Allah will forgive Imam Al-Ghazzali Rahimahullah for his error and even reward his Ijtehad(efforts) to arrive at what he thought was right.

In a Hadith:

Narrated `Amr bin Al-`As:

That he heard Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) saying, *”If a judge gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is correct (i.e. agrees with Allah and His Apostle’s verdict) he will receive a double reward, and if he gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is wrong, (i.e. against that of Allah and His Apostle) even then he will get a reward .”* [Al-Bukhari 7352, Muslim 1716a]

If someone asks ‘how can we reject the statement of a Shaikh like Imam Al-Ghazzali Rahimahullah?’ we will, in reply to those brothers, present the statement of Imam Malik bin Anas Rahimahullah.

Imam Malik bin Anas said: Everyone after the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) will have his sayings accepted and rejected – except the Prophet .ﷺ”

(*4)(*5)

Can a scholar like Imam Al-Ghazzali make a mistake?

Yes he can,and anyone can make a mistake except for the beloved Prophet ﷺ.

Imam Ash-Shafii said:

“The sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) reach, as well as escape from, every one of us. So whenever I voice my opinion, or formulate a principle, where something contrary to my view exists on the authority of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam), then the correct view is what the Messenger of Allaah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) has said, and it is my view.”(*6)

So we can conclude that there is no authentic Hadith about fasting on the 27th of Rajab and Imam Al-Ghazzali Rahimahullah, the virtuous Imam, erred in mentioning the virtues of fasting on the 27th night of Rajab.

Anything correct is from Allah and anything wrong is from me and Satan the accursed.

May Allah guide all of us to follow The Quran and The Sunnah. Aameen.

Abu Muaaz Mohammed Manna,
Mangalore, India.

27th Rajab 1440
■□■□■□■
Reminder:
For more on this subject do read:

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/75394/fasting-in-the-month-of-rajab
■□■□■□■

Footnotes:

(*1)Abu Zakaria Yahya Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī popularly called An-Nawawī or Imam Nawawī (631–676 A.H./1234–1277 CE) [Wikipedia].

(*2)Shihāb al-Dīn Abu ’l-Faḍl Aḥmad b. Nūr al-Dīn ʿAlī b. Muḥammad b Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī) (18 February 1372 – 2 February 1449 [852 A.H.]) [Wikipedia].

(*3) Imam Al-Ghazali full name Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad al-Ghazālī (CE 1058 – 19 December 1111).[Wikipedia]

(*4) This is well known among the later scholars to be a saying of Maalik. Ibn ‘Abdul Haadi declared it saheeh in Irshaad as- Saalik (227/1); Ibn ‘Abdul Barr in Jaami’ Bayaan al-‘Ilm (2/91) & Ibn Hazm in Usool al-Ahkaam (6/145, 179) had narrated it as a saying of Al-Hakam ibn ‘Utaibah and Mujaahid; Taqi ad- Deen as-Subki gave it, delighted with its beauty, in al- Fataawaa (1/148) as a saying of Ibn ‘Abbaas, and then said: “These words were originally those of Ibn ‘Abbaas and Mujaahid, from whom Maalik (radi Allaahu ‘anhu) took them, and he became famous for them.” It seems that Imaam Ahmad then took this saying from them, as Abu Daawood has said in Masaa’il of Imaam Ahmad (p. 276): “I heard Ahmad say, ‘Everyone is accepted and rejected in his opinions, with the exception of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam)’.”
http://www.qss.org/articles/salah/footnotes/01_fn.html#fn28

(*5)Imam Mālik ibn Anas ( 711–795 CE / 93–179 AH), author of Muwatta Imam Malik.[Wikipedia]

(*6)Related by Haakim with a continuous sanad up to Shaafi’i, as in Taareekh Dimashq of Ibn ‘Asaakir (15/1/3), I’laam al- Mooqi’een (2/363, 364) & Eeqaaz (p. 100). (Web link as in footnote (*4))

(*7) Abū ʿAbdullāh Muhammad ibn Idrīs al-Shāfiʿī (767–820 CE, 150–204 AH).[Wikipedia]

*○Hadith translations taken from sunnah.com○.
*The weak hadith on Rajab was translated by me.

□■□■□■□■

The story of Habeeb An-Najjar in Tafseer Ibn Kathir in Surah Yaseen.

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله و على آله و صحبه أجمعين…

From Ayah #13 (of Surah Yaseen, Chapter 36) onwards Imam ibn Kathir mentions the story of a man called Habeeb An-Najjar in Tafseer Ibn Kathir.

The Ayah:
( وَاضْرِبْ لَهُم مَّثَلاً أَصْحَابَ الْقَرْيَةِ إِذْ جَاءَهَا الْمُرْسَلُونَ . إِذْ أَرْسَلْنَا إِلَيْهِمُ اثْنَيْنِ فَكَذَّبُوهُمَا فَعَزَّزْنَا بِثَالِثٍ فَقَالُوا إِنَّا إِلَيْكُم مُّرْسَلُونَ )

The story is not authentically proven to be the context of the above Ayaat (Verses).

See Islamqa:

https://islamqa.info/ar/answers/170943/اختلاف-المفسرين-في-الرسل-المذكورين-في-سورة-يس

Rough Notes: Many a times the Sahaba weren’t aware of some Islamic issues. Ten Examples!

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله و على آله و صحبه أجمعين…

In a discussion with a brother on the issue of the actions of the Sahaba being a proof over the statement of the Prophet ﷺ, we were discussing the possibility of some Sahaba not being aware of some issues already explained by the Prophet ﷺ.

Thus I tried searching some clear examples of these cases from the Kutub-us-Sitta, usually looking out for the famous examples most frequently mentioned and discussed in scholarly circles.

So I’ll mention the link of the Hadith with a very summarized context and you can read the Ahadith for yourself In sha Allah from the links.

So what’s the point we want to make!?

We want to conclude that if The Prophet ﷺ mentions something and the actions or statement of a companion (Sahabi) contradicts that statement, then the words of The Prophet ﷺ will be preferred over the actions or statements of the Sahabi, because it is highly possible that the Sahabi acted contradictory to the Hadith of the Prophet ﷺ because of being unaware of the Hadith,i.e. the Hadith not reaching the Sahabi.

Some examples:

1.

https://sunnah.com/abudawud/21/53

Aisha (رضي الله عنها) did not know that it was allowed for wives to wash the dead bodies of their husbands.

https://sunnah.com/urn/1288140

2.
https://sunnah.com/abudawud/20/41

Fatima (رضي الله عنها) did not know that Prophet’s ﷺ property is non-inheritable.

Even all his wives except Aisha (رضي الله عنه) were unaware of this-

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/85/7

3.
Ummu Habibah Ramlah did not know that marrying two sisters at once was impermissible.

https://sunnah.com/nasai/26/89

4.
Many Sahaba, including Umar (رضي الله عنه) weren’t aware of the Ayah that signalled that Prophet ﷺ will also die like the other Prophets.

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/472

5.
Usama bin Zaid (رضي الله عنه) wasn’taware that an outward acceptance of Islam was barely enough to be a Muslim.

https://sunnah.com/muslim/1/183

6.
In the meetting (war council) before fighting the Zakat rejectors (rebels) Abu Bakr and Umar (رضي الله عنهما) discuss and debate over whether to fight or not to fight the rejectors of Zakat as they were basically Muslim. As they both only knew a part of a Hadith:

Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah ‘s Apostle said, ” I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ and whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,’ his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)”(Bukhari, 2956)

See the discussion:

https://sunnah.com/muslim/1/32

If they had known this Hadith then it would’ve been easier for them to conclude that Abu Bakr (رضي الله عنه) was right.

https://sunnah.com/bukhari/2/18

So Abdullah ibn Umar (رضي الله عنه) had the knowledge of this Hadith, Abu Bakr and Umar (رضي الله عنهما) didn’t have it. (As a side point we also realise that they didn’t call Abdullah bin Umar for the meeting)

(I remember reading something similar in Fathul Bari of Imam Ibn Hajr.)

7.
Umar ibn al Khattab (رضي الله عنه) didn’t know what was the Diyyah (blood money) for causing abortion (harming/killing) an unborn child. Mughira bin Shubah (رضي الله عنه) knew it.

https://sunnah.com/urn/1269570

8.
Saeed bin Jubair (رضي الله عنه) went to Abdullah bin Umar (رضي الله عنه) to seek knowledge on the issue of Lian.

https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/13/29

9.

Umar (رضي الله عنه) did not know about the concession allowing an irrevocably divorced women, that she can leave her house and stay elsewhere.

https://sunnah.com/nasai/27/163

10.
Umar (رضي الله عنه) was unaware of the fact that if a person seeks permission to enter a house three times and he is not allowed/responded, then he should return.

https://sunnah.com/muslim/38/46