Using the word ‘Khuda’ for Allah is permissible

Some evidences that using the word Khuda (a Persian word for The Almighty) for Allah is permissible.

Abdullah ibn Mubarak, a Tabai, using the word ‘Khuda’

“And it was also narrated from Muḥammad bin Salām, who said: Faḍālah asked ‘Abdullāh bin al-Mubārak concerning the Descent (al-Nuzūl) [of Allāh] on the night of the middle of Sha‘bān. ‘Abd Allāh replied: ‘O weak one! Do you find God (Khudā, Khaddaya) to be a night-watchman (actually shab-gīr, written in Arabic as Khosheerkun)? He descends how He wills.'”

Note: By asking specifically about the 15th of Sha’ban, the questioner implied that Allah’s “Descent” is a special event limited to that night. Ibn al-Mubārak refutes this by asking, “Do you think God is a night-worker [who only shows up on this specific night]?” He then affirms the orthodox Sunni stance in the final Arabic clause: “He descends how He wills” (meaning, He is not restricted by the limits you are imposing).

Imam Ibn Taymiyyah on using the word Khuda

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: The Lord, may He be glorified, may be referred to in Arabic as Allah, ar-Rahmaan (the Most Gracious), ar-Raheem (the Most Merciful), and in Farsi as Khoda and so on, but He, may He be glorified, is One, and there are many ways to refer to Him.

(End quote from al-Fataawa al-Kubra, 6/568, translation of this quote was taken from islamqa.info)

Shaykh Zubair Ali Zai on using the word Khuda

🎧 The Triumph of Faith and Reason: Reflections on the Debate 🎧

Shaykh Hafiz Khizr Hayat wrote on his Facebook page:

I listened to the dialogue between Shamail Nadwi Sahib and Javed Akhtar Sahib for approximately an hour; Shamail Sahib conversed exceptionally well.

🛡️ The Independence of the Truth


Even had Shamail Sahib lost, the case of the Religion (Deen) would have remained established in its place, for the Religion of Allah is not dependent upon any debate or disputation.


However, in any event, he demonstrated with great elegance and argumentation to Javed Akhtar Sahib that atheists (Mulhideen) are devoid not only of the wealth of faith (Iman) and certainty (Yaqeen) but are also destitute of intellect (Aql) and wisdom.


⚔️ A History of Intellectual Victory


Dr. Zakir Naik silenced William [Campbell]; subsequently, we witnessed atheists like Owais Iqbal being humiliated at the hands of Mufti Yasir Nadeem and Qaiser Raja, among others.


Now, the stuttering and retreat of Javed Akhtar have proven that the religious individuals and clerics (Maulvis) of the contemporary era are not lagging behind anyone, even in the fields of intellect and philosophy.


🏆
> Al-Hamdu lillahi alladhi anjaza wa’dahu wa nasara ‘abdahu wa hazama al-ahzaba wahdah.
> “Praise be to Allah, Who fulfilled His promise, granted victory to His servant, and defeated the confederates alone.”
>
#Khayal_e_Khatir

(Translated by Mohammed bin Thajammul Hussain Manna.)

Victory of Mufti Shamail Nadwi – comments by Shaykh Abdul Lateef Muhammad As-Salafi Al- Madani

🌟 The Excellence of Shamail (Shamail-e-Shamail) 🌟


Alhamdulillah alladhi bi ni’matihi tatimmu as-salihat (Praise be to Allah by whose Grace good deeds are accomplished).

🔗https://www.youtube.com/live/pythOMyPcHw?si=VSngp8P4I02kLPmM


The dialogue regarding the Existence of God between Mr. Javed Akhtar and Mufti Shamail Nadwi was not merely a debate; rather, it was a significant milestone on a creedal (Aqdi) and intellectual (Fikri) level.

The sentiments of gratitude to Allah and the prayers and accolades for Shamail Nadwi expressed by Muslims belonging to various schools of thought (Masalik) and sects are proof that today, the Truth (Haq) was represented in a robust manner.

🎙️ Universal Representation


Today, Shamail Muhammadi Sahib was not acting as a deputy merely for his own person; rather, he was representing all people of faith generally, and Islam specifically.

This is because if there is any religion in the contemporary world that is convincing humanity of the existence of God with resounding clarity and unwavering conviction, it is Islam.


This is all despite the fact that concerted efforts are underway globally—on political, financial, ethical, and psychological levels—to prove Islam false.

⚖️ The Victory of Truth

Today, Muslims had much to lose, yet by the Grace of Allah, we lost nothing; rather, we gained much.

Conversely, an atheist (Mulhid) had nothing to lose, yet despite this, he lost and exposed his own intellectual vacuum (Fikri Khala).


This was not the defeat of an individual, but the manifestation of the inherent intellectual weakness of Falsehood (Batil).


The Continuity of Divine Defense


This is, in reality, the perfection of the Divine Religion (Deen-e-Rabbani). Debaters (Munazir) like Shamail Muhammadi have been born before this, exist today, and In Sha Allah, will continue to be born in the days to come.

🧠 Conclusion


In conclusion, I would simply say:
The time has arrived that, as always, Atheism (Ilhad) must be answered not with emotions, but on scholarly, rational, and academic grounds.
And Alhamdulillah, our Ummah possesses the capability (Salahiyat), the aptitude (Isti’dad), and the intellectual capital (Sarmaya-e-Ilm) to do so.


✍️ Shaykh Abdul Lateef Muhammad As-Salafi Al-Madani Udupi, Karnataka

(Translated from Urdu to English, by Mohammed bin Thajammul Hussain Manna from the Shaykh’s Facebook post. The title of this WordPress post ‘Victory of Mufti Shamail Nadwi’ was added by the translator..)

🛑 Opposition to (The Governor) Hajjaj is Opposition to Islam 🛑

The tyranny and oppression of Hajjaj bin Yusuf ath-Thaqafi has been an established fact and a byword throughout history. Despite this, historical examples exist where certain individuals established Hajjaj bin Yusuf ath-Thaqafi as the criterion (Mi’yar) between disbelief (Kufr) and Islam.


📚 The Case of Mundhir Abu Hassan

There is a narrator named Mundhir Abu Hassan; regarding him, the people of knowledge have written:

“Kana Hajjajiyyan, Yaqulu ‘Man Khaalafa Al-Hajjaju Faqad Khaalafa Al-Islam'”

“He was a Hajjaji (a partisan of Hajjaj); he used to say: ‘Whoever opposed Hajjaj has indeed opposed Islam’.”

References:
Ath-Thiqat by Ibn Hibban: 5/421
Musnad Ahmad: 33/315 (Ar-Risalah Edition)


⚠️ A Warning Against Exaggeration
This is one of the worst examples of exaggeration (Ghulu) in obedience to rulers and of using Islam as a crutch to defend their tyranny and oppression.
In the contemporary era, just as “Hajjajis” exist, there are similarly—nay, even more so—those present who worship their own respective “Hajjajs.”

(Translated by Mohammed bin Thajammul Hussain, from the Facebook post of Shaykh Hafiz Khizr Hayat, Islamic University of Madinah, from Urdu to English.)

A Moment in the Haram: Some Fiqh Benefits from an Image From Masjid Al-Haram

This image captures a profound moment containing several valuable Fiqhi (jurisprudential) benefits. It features one of the most senior scholars of our time, Shaykh Saleh bin Fawzan Al-Fawzan (may Allah preserve him), praying in the state of Ihram behind the younger Imam of Masjid Al-Haram, Shaykh Yasser Ad-Dosary (may Allah preserve him). (Maghrib Salah, 29th Nov 2025, Source: @insharifain on Twitter)

Benefit 1

Shaykh Al-Fawzan, a senior jurist (Faqih), prays behind the younger Shaykh Ad-Dosary, respecting the established authority of the Imam Ar-Ratib (the appointed Imam) in accordance with the Sunnah.

The Principle: The Imam Ar-Ratib (officially appointed Imam) holds the primary right to lead the Jama’ah (congregation), superseding others even if they are superior in knowledge (A’lam) or age (Akbar).

Benefit 2: The Hierarchy of Leading Prayer (Imamah)

The image demonstrates the Afqah (more knowledgeable, Shaykh Al-Fawzan) following the Aqra (better Qari, Shaykh Ad-Dosary), illustrating the harmony between these two qualifications and adherence to administrative appointment. Classical Fiqh debates the priority of the Aqra (most versed in Qur’an) versus the Afqah (most learned in Jurisprudence). The general majority of the Ulama prioritize the Aqra for the position of Imam.

Benefit 3

Shaykh Al-Fawzan occupies the position directly behind the Imam, fulfilling the prophetic instruction that it is Mustahabb (recommended) for “People of Intellect and Wisdom” (Ulu al-Ahlam wa an-Nuha) to stand immediately behind the Imam. This proximity ensures there are qualified individuals to perform Fath (correction of the Imam’s recitation) or Istikhlaf (assuming leadership if the Imam’s wudu breaks).

Benefit 4

There is a valid difference of opinion regarding the placement of hands in Qiyam (standing), as seen in the people praying behind Shaykh Ad-Dosary:

  • On the chest (‘Ala as-Sadr) but slightly above the navel (Fouq as-Surrah): Observed on Shaykh Ad-Dosary (Imam). This aligns with the Shafi’i school and the opinions of contemporary Hadith scholars, utilizing the Wad’ technique (placing palm over hand).
  • Below the navel (Taht as-Surrah): Observed on Shaykh Al-Fawzan (Ma’mum). This aligns with the Hanbali and Hanafi schools, utilizing the Qabd technique (grasping the wrist).

This visualizes Ikhtilaf al-Tanawwu (diversity of valid practice), showing that such differences do not impede congregational unity.

Benefit 5

Shaykh Saleh Al-Fawzan chose to use a walking stick to stand (in Qiyam) instead of using a chair. This teaches us that it is permissible to use a stick while standing in Salah.

[Fiqh scholars agreed on the permissibility of praying while leaning against something if there is a necessity, where he is unable to pray unless by doing so. (Refer: Al-Mausu’ah al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kuwaitiyyah 4/105 and Al-Majmu’ Sharh al-Muhazzab 3/259)[[1]]]

Benefit 6

Shaykh Al-Fawzan utilizes a walking stick to maintain the Rukn (pillar) of standing, demonstrating strict adherence to the hierarchy of ability (Istita’ah). In other words, he did not abandon standing since he was able to do so with the assistance of a stick.

Benefit 7

Shaykh Al-Fawzan’s Ihram garment appears to have a button or a pin to keep it in place. The use of buttons, clips, or pins to secure the Ihram is Mubah (permissible), particularly under the principle of Taysir (facilitation, making ease) to prevent the exposure of the ‘Awrah and to maintain Khushu’ (focus). The prohibition (of using stitched garments in Ihram) applies to garments tailored to the body’s shape (e.g., shirts, trousers), not to the presence of stitches or fasteners in themselves.

Benefit 8: Covering The Shoulders

The image confirms that Idtiba’ (exposing the right shoulder) is restricted to Tawaf. During Salah, covering both shoulders is the correct Sunnah.

Benefit 9

Wearing spectacles is permissible in Salah as long as the spectacles do not inhibit the nose and forehead from touching the ground during prostration.

[Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about the person who wears large glasses, which prevent him from being able to prostrate fully on the seven parts of the body.

He replied: If they prevent the end of the nose from reaching the ground when prostrating that is not acceptable, because what is carrying the face in this case is the glasses, which are not at the end of the nose, rather they rest on the bridge of the nose. Based on this, the prostration is not valid. The one who wears glasses that prevent him from placing his nose in the place of prostration has to take them off when prostrating. End quote from Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (13/186).][[2]]

Benefit 10

Military officials, grand scholars, and the general public stand shoulder-to-shoulder, reflecting the egalitarian nature of Islamic worship where the only distinction is Taqwa (piety).


[1] https://www.muftiwp.gov.my/en/artikel/al-kafi-li-al-fatawi/3168-al-kafi-1138-the-ruling-of-praying-while-leaning-against-something#:~:text=Question:,it%20is%20makruh%20(detestable).

[2] https://islamqa.info/en/answers/98466/ruling-on-prostrating-when-wearing-glasses

(Penned by Mohammed bin Thajammul Hussain Manna)

To read a brief biography of Shaykh Saleh bin Fawzan Al-Fawzan CLICK HERE.

To read about ‘The First English Seerah Book Only Based On Authentic Hadiths!’ CLICK HERE.