A Great Moral Catastrophe Befalls the Saudi People Due to an Unjust Decision by the Minister of Education –Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-‘Abbad Al-Badr

12/06/1438 H.

In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds. The [good] outcome is for the righteous, and there is no aggression except against the oppressors. May Allah’s peace, blessings, and grace be upon His servant and His trustworthy Messenger, our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family, his Companions, and those who follow them in excellence until the Day of Judgment.

As for what follows:

A few days ago, at the end of Jumadi Al-Ula, a grave event occurred, from which far-reaching evil will result. This is the appointment by the Minister of Education, upon the nomination of the President of The Taif University, of a woman as Dean of the College of Medicine, to be a point of reference for men, both instructors and students.

The Okaz newspaper published on Monday, 30 Jumadi Al-Ula 1438 H, corresponding to 27 February 2017 CE, information about this reprehensible event. It stated, under the headline: “By Ministerial Decree… Appointment of the First Saudi Female ‘Dean’ at The Taif University”:

Taif University yesterday recorded the appointment of the first female dean in Saudi universities for both male and female student sections, in a new and important step in the academic sector, following the issuance of a decision by the Minister of Education, Dr. Ahmad Al-Issa, appointing Professor Dalal Muhiyyiddin Namangani as Dean of the College of Medicine at the University.

Dr. Namangani, after the ministerial decree was issued, officially became the first female dean of a college that includes faculty members and students of both genders in the Kingdom’s public universities. Previously, appointments to the position of dean were restricted to men, while the administrative ladder for female academics within colleges stopped at the level of Vice-Dean. No Saudi female academic has previously held the position of dean of a college in any public university in the Kingdom, with the exception of Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, which is a private university for girls, in addition to female academics holding the same position in private colleges and universities.

Informed academic sources confirmed that the decision to appoint the Dean was based on the criteria of merit and scientific and practical competence, giving them precedence over the gender difference among faculty members in the college. They noted that the decision is consistent with the directives of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 in supporting women’s participation in the labour market, enhancing their role in the public and private sectors, and empowering them professionally.

For her part, Dr. Namangani said in her first statement to «Okaz»: “The state, under the leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz, has done justice to women as important partners in serving the nation in many fields. I extend my gratitude to the Minister of Education, Dr. Ahmad Al-Issa, for his decision to appoint me as Dean of the College of Medicine at the University.

I also appreciate the role of the University President, Dr. Hussam bin Abdul Wahhab Zaman, in nominating me for this position, which supports the progress of women in the country. I affirm my commitment to strive diligently to achieve the hopes and aspirations placed upon me with my appointment to this new position, to elevate the College of Medicine to the highest levels of academic quality, in cooperation with my male and female colleagues, members of the faculty in the college.”

Dr.Namangani, a consultant in histopathology and anatomical pathology, in addition to her work as a faculty member at the College of Medicine, was serving as Acting Dean of University Studies at the same university – the highest position in the university pertaining to the female students’ section – before her appointment to her new position.

It appears that this decision will open the door wide for female faculty members in various public universities in the Kingdom to advance to higher academic positions in the future, and to break the limited career stagnation within the confines of women’s departments in colleges and female student sections in public universities.

It is noteworthy that the University, since the appointment of Dr. Hussam bin Abdul Wahhab Zaman, has launched many important programs and projects, most notably the “Program Transformation” program, which aims to develop all its academic programs, as well as to develop all study plans, to ensure the extent to which quality requirements and academic accreditation are met, and alignment with the labour market, and to improve the quality and efficiency of those programs; and the “Da’im” (Supporter) project to encourage new faculty members to contribute to scientific research.”

Regarding this event, the details of which were published by the newspaper, I wish to draw attention to the following:

1- The appointment of the female Dean by the Minister of Education, upon the nomination of the University President, is a grave offense to the Saudi people who adhere to Islamic morals and ethics. It is an offense to the Saudi state, which was founded upon the arbitration of the Book (the Qur’an) and the Sunnah, and as a result of which it achieved survival and continuity in its governance over the vast majority of the Arabian Peninsula. It is an offense to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman (hafidhahullah), by its occurrence and recording in history during his reign. This act by the Minister and the Director is a form of cooperation in sin and transgression, and it contradicts trustworthiness and indicates treachery. Allah (azza wa jall) said: “Indeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due” [An-Nisa 4:58], and He said: “O you who have believed, do not betray Allah and the Messenger or betray your trusts while you know [the consequence]” [Al-Anfal 8:27]. It is obligatory upon the Minister to rectify the matter and cancel his unjust decision, so that the country, government and people, may be safe from its evil effects and dire consequences.

2- If this unjust decision is implemented, it will be followed by the ease of intermingling (Ikhtilat) between male and female instructors and male and female students, and the resulting abolition of the closed-circuit screens through which men teach women, and the pursuit of mixing boys and girls in study seats. These means and ends are what the Westernizers, who follow their desires, seek in order to corrupt this country until it becomes similar to those countries that have preceded it in various forms of licentiousness by implementing Western plans to corrupt them. This is despite the fact that these concessions to appease the Westerners – Jews, Christians, and others – though they may please them, are not enough for them. Nothing will suffice them except that you follow their religion, as Allah (azza wa jall) said: “And never will the Jews or the Christians approve of you until you follow their religion. Say, ‘Indeed, the guidance of Allah is the [only] guidance.’ If you were to follow their desires after what has come to you of knowledge, you would have against Allah no protector or helper” [Al-Baqarah 2:120].

Among what the eminent Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymin (rahimahullah) said about the danger of the Westernizers and their relentless efforts to cause corruption in this land and destroy the morals of its people, is his statement in his commentary on Riyadh As-Salihin (2/487) when explaining the Hadith: “Indeed, the world is sweet and green, and indeed, Allah has made you successors in it, and He observes how you will act. So, fear the world and fear women, for the first tribulation of the Children of Israel was because of women.” He said: “Therefore, it is obligatory upon us, as a Muslim nation, to oppose these ideas and to stand against them in every place and on every occasion, knowing that there exist among us a people – may Allah not increase their numbers nor let them achieve their aim– who desire this matter for this Muslim, peaceful, and conservative country. For they know that the last stronghold of the Muslims is this land which includes the sacred sites of the Muslims and the Qiblah of the Muslims, so that they may corrupt it, and thereby the entire Islamic Ummah becomes corrupted. For the entire Islamic Ummah looks to this land to see what it does. So if modesty and religion are demolished in this land, then peace be upon them (i.e., it’s over for them) and peace be upon religion and modesty. Therefore, I say: O my brothers, it is obligatory upon us – young, middle-aged, and old; scholars and learners – to oppose these ideas and to rally all people against them, so that they do not spread among us like fire in dry tinder and burn us. We ask Allah to turn the plots of those who orchestrate such matters against them, that He may not let them achieve their goals, and that He may suppress them by means of righteous men until their Fitnah is extinguished. Indeed, He is Bountiful, Most Generous.”

I say after this sincere and eloquent statement by Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymin (rahimahullah): Where is the Ghirah (protective jealousy) over what is inviolable (female relatives)? Where is the distancing from the causes of Diyathah (lack of protective jealousy)? Where is modesty (Haya’)? Where is honor (Shahama)? Where is manliness (Rujulah)? Where is propriety/chivalry (Muru’ah)? Where is dignity (Anafah)? Where are the noble souls (An-Nufus Al-Abiyyah)? Where are the lofty aspirations (Al-Himam Al-‘Aliyyah)? Where are the virtues of men (Shiyam Ar-Rijal)? Where is the learning from those around us whose women preceded them in imitating Western women, so they uncovered their faces, and then their affair led to shameful nudity/undressing (At-Ta’arri Al-Mushin)? “So have they not travelled through the earth and have hearts by which to reason and ears by which to hear? For indeed, it is not eyes that are blinded, but blinded are the hearts which are within the breasts” [Al-Hajj 22:46]. O Allah, Your gentleness upon the remaining remnant, the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries.

3- The Westernizers in this country are, in reality, the true enemies of the Saudi state because they seek to bring about sins and violations of Shari’ah rulings, which bring grave harm upon the country, government and people. The Westernizers have no glory (Majd) themselves, and they strive diligently to destroy the glory of others, which is the great glory bequeathed by King Abdul Aziz (rahimahullah). How greatly do those who inherited this glory need to be wary of the schemes of these enemies who cause corruption in the land and do not bring about reform!

4- This event, the details of which Okaz published, is a great moral catastrophe that portends evil and a great tribulation if it is not rectified by the Minister cancelling his unjust decision. And if he does not do so, then how good and how excellent it would be if he and the University Director were to be met with their removal from their posts and made to taste the bitterness of dismissal from their positions.

I ask Allah (azza wa jall) not to hold us accountable for what the foolish among us have done, and to keep the Saudi land safe from the schemes of its Western and Westernizing enemies, and to preserve for it its security, its faith, its safety, and its Islam, and to suppress everyone who intends ill for it, and to guide those in authority therein – foremost among them the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman (hafidhahullah) – to all that has a praiseworthy outcome in this world and the Hereafter. Indeed, He is All-Hearing, All-Responsive.

And may Allah send peace, blessings, and grace upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and his Companions.[1]


[1] Source: http://al-abbaad.com/articles/244302, https://salfi.net/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2921 .

Beware of Destroying the Morals of the Saudi People, O Officials of the General Entertainment Authority!- Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad Al-Badr

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds. May Allah bestow His peace, blessings, and grace upon our Prophet Muḥammad, and upon his family and all his Companions.

To proceed: The Westernizers (advocates of Westernization) in the Saudi lands became active starting from the era of King ‘Abdullāh (may Allah have mercy on him), which lasted approximately ten years. They introduced matters foreign to this land, involving an expansion in the pursuit of desires, which leads to a great deviation for this country, as Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, has said: {And Allah wants to accept your repentance, but those who follow [their] passions want you to digress into a great deviation.} [An-Nisā’: 27]. The Saudi lands are the last bastion of preserving Islamic morals and etiquettes, which ensure safety from the ingratitude for blessings that brings about divine retribution. These Westernizers have particularly targeted the Salmāni era (the reign of King Salmān) with their efforts to establish the General Entertainment Authority, following their endeavors during this era to issue regulations for the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (Hay’at al-Amr bil-Ma‘rūf wan-Nahy ‘an al-Munkar) that resulted in its weakening and the loss of its prestige. Regarding the establishment of this Authority, I have previously stated: “It is feared that it will transgress what is permissible into what is unlawful according to Sharī‘ah, matters from which this land was previously safe, such as the opening of cinemas, which incur Allah’s wrath and destroy morals. I previously wrote an article on this titled: ‘An Exposition of the Danger of Opening Cinemas in the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries,’ published on 1/1/1430 H. And [I mentioned] their efforts to appoint a female deputy to the head of the General Sports Authority for the women’s section.” I stated this in an article titled: “An Exposition of the Transgression of the Westernizers During the Salmāni Era and the Era Preceding It,” published on 10/1/1438 H.

Al Jazirah newspaper, in its issue 16083 dated 9/1/1438 H, published information about this Authority and the extent of joy among the followers of desires at its establishment. It stated under the headline: “The Train of Joy Departs with a Calendar Full of Events”: “When the noble Royal Decree was issued on Saturday, the thirtieth of Rajab 1437 H, establishing the General Entertainment Authority and appointing His Excellency Mr. Aḥmad ibn ‘Aqīl al-Khaṭīb as its chairman, hopes were pinned on this Authority for the creation of joy and for joining other countries in this field, which the sons and daughters of this nation have long awaited with great eagerness. This is especially so given that many are sometimes forced to travel to other countries in search of quality entertainment events that are not available in the major and pivotal Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for several reasons, including the absence of a body concerned with this joyful and also productive sector in the Kingdom… The train of joy departed after the first events in the calendar unveiled by the Authority for the year 2016, which was the laser show by the American troupe iLuminate, held at the Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University theater in Riyadh, attended by His Excellency the Chairman of the Authority, Mr. Aḥmad al-Khaṭīb. This show, occurring for the first time in the Kingdom, came with the interest and keenness of the body authorized to create entertainment and spread joy in the country, the ‘General Entertainment Authority,’ which Saudis received with optimism and hope that it would bring a new form to the world of entertainment events in Saudi Arabia, with a young chairman assisted by a group of young men and women from various regions and governorates of the Kingdom.” Al Jazirah newspaper also quoted the Chairman of the Authority, Aḥmad al-Khaṭīb, as saying: “Cinema is considered entertainment, and its project is under consideration, but it is still prohibited, and no decision has been made regarding it.” The newspaper also stated: “The Entertainment Authority had disclosed its programs and events for 2016, which included artistic and theatrical performances, with an expected attendance of approximately half a million visitors, and revenues exceeding 43 million riyals.” And the newspaper reported: “Last Thursday evening, at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Riyadh, the iLuminate troupe, known for its stunning visual performances, presented its show. The event was attended by His Excellency Aḥmad ibn ‘Aqīl al-Khaṭīb, the British Ambassador in Riyadh, in addition to a number of diplomatic corps members from the Embassy of the United States of America and the Embassy of Finland in the Kingdom.”

Among the worst of what has occurred in this regard in the recent past was the holding of an entertainment event in the city of Jeddah called “Comic Con,” sponsored by the General Entertainment Authority, during which reprehensible matters (munkarāt) took place. ‘Ukāẓ newspaper, on 18/5/1438 H, published information about this painful event, stating: “The CEO of the General Entertainment Authority, Engineer ‘Amr al-Madanī, said: ‘The “Comic Con” event is an important addition to the cultural and artistic events hosted by Saudi Arabia. Given the large numbers of Saudis who attended the event outside Saudi Arabia, we noticed a strong desire to host such types of events.'”

Those who follow their desires, wanting the land of Saudi Arabia to deviate tremendously, rejoiced at this vile event. Conversely, those zealous for this country—both its government and its people—who desire its safety from tribulations (fitan) and from ingratitude for blessings which brings about divine retribution, were pained by it. As Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, has said: {And Allah presents an example: a city which was safe and secure, its provision coming to it in abundance from every place, but it denied the favors of Allah. So Allah made it taste the envelopment of hunger and fear for what they had been doing.} [An-Naḥl: 112]. And He said: {And whoever changes the favor of Allah after it has come to him – then indeed, Allah is severe in penalty.} [Al-Baqarah: 211]. And He said: {That is because Allah would not change a favor which He had bestowed upon a people until they change what is within themselves.} [Al-Anfāl: 53]. And He said: {And [remember] when your Lord proclaimed, ‘If you are grateful, I will surely increase you [in favor]; but if you deny, indeed, My punishment is severe.’} [Ibrāhīm: 7]. And He said: {And when We intend to destroy a city, We command its affluent but they defiantly disobey therein; so the word comes into effect upon it, and We destroy it with [complete] destruction.} [Al-Isrā’: 16].

The call to good has limitless benefit, and the call to evil has limitless harm, as the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Whoever calls to guidance will have a reward similar to the rewards of those who follow him, without that diminishing any of their rewards. And whoever calls to misguidance will have a sin upon him similar to the sins of those who follow him, without that diminishing any of their sins.” [Muslim, The Book of Knowledge, 2674].

Let every official, in any position of authority, small or large, fear Allah before he departs from it through death or dismissal. And let him be extremely cautious lest any destruction of morals occurs at his hands in this land from which light has emanated, and which contains the Qiblah (direction of prayer) of the Muslims and the sites of their Ḥajj rituals.

I ask Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, to protect this land, its government and its people, from all evil, and to guide it to all good, and to safeguard it from the evil of the wicked and the plotting of the profligate. Indeed, He is All-Hearing, All-Responsive.

May Allah bestow His peace, blessings, and grace upon our Prophet Muḥammad, and upon his family and Companions.

[1438/06/06 – 2017/03/05]

Source

What is the ruling on supplicating for the ruler without the approval of the Dā‘ī (caller to Islam) who is making the supplication?- Shaykh Nasiruddeen Al-Albani (Rahimahullah)

Questioner: The ruling on supplicating for the ruler without riḍāka (your approval – masculine singular).

Shaykh: ‘Amr doesn’t approve?

Questioner: Yes.

Shaykh: They say ‘Amr doesn’t approve.

Another Questioner: The Dā‘ī himself is not pleased.

Another Questioner: Without the Dā‘ī being pleased.

Shaykh: Ah, the pronoun refers to the nearest mentioned [noun].

‘Alī al-Ḥalabī: Our Shaykh, he mentioned the second-person pronoun (for ‘you,’ the addressee) [when he said] “without riḍāka” (your approval – masculine singular).

Shaykh: In any case, clarify your question because there’s now a misunderstanding.

Questioner: The ruling on supplicating for the ruler without the approval of the Dā‘ī who is making the supplication.

Shaykh: Heh, this clarifies it. But if you had stopped at “without riḍāhi” (his approval), the pronoun would refer to the nearest mentioned [noun].

Questioner: I said riḍāka (your approval – masculine singular), [not] riḍāki (your approval – feminine singular).

‘Alī al-Ḥalabī: Meaning, considering you [the questioner] as a Dā‘ī.

Questioner: Yes.

Shaykh: What is the difference between riḍāhi (his approval) and what was the second one?

‘Alī al-Ḥalabī: Riḍāka (your approval – masculine singular). It’s as if [the question is]: what is the ruling if you were to supplicate for someone else without your own approval [of doing so]?

Shaykh: Ah, so, once again, you must pronounce the kāf with a hams (whisper/aspiration, indicating the masculine form).

‘Alī al-Ḥalabī: Hahaha, this is from the science of Tajwīd (rules of Qur’anic recitation)!

Shaykh: Hahaha.

Questioner: May Allah preserve you, my master.

Shaykh: Meaning, you should say riḍāka (with the masculine suffix).

Questioner: Riḍāka.

Shaykh: Meaning, your breath should reach me (i.e., the aspiration should be audible).

Questioner: May Allah preserve you.

Another Questioner: …The hams [for] riḍāka.

Shaykh: Yes, isn’t this hams? Meaning, [the Dā‘ī] is compelled?

Questioner: Yes.

Shaykh: You received the answer previously.

Questioner: Yes.

Shaykh: Correct.

Questioner: Alright. Perhaps the Shaykh, brother Abū Ṭalāl, mentioned to you that I am an Imām and Khaṭīb (preacher) in Iraq. And my presence in the mosque… we know of no other avenue for Da‘wah (Islamic propagation) there. Indeed, the Dā‘ī is effectively neutralized and his efforts obstructed if he is deprived of the mosque. And with this condition present (i.e., being allowed to preach if he supplicates for the ruler), perhaps… I mean, I don’t want to overstate the benefit or detail it extensively. There is a benefit if it (the platform for Da‘wah) is maintained through supplicating for the ruler. Meaning, now the specific situation has become quite clear.

Another Questioner: Meaning, he was removed or dismissed from his position.

Shaykh: You said this earlier.

Another Questioner: Yes, the reason is that he refused to supplicate for the president or the ruler there during the Jumu‘ah khuṭbah (Friday sermon). So, he is asking if it is permissible for him to supplicate for the ruler while he (the Imām) is not pleased [with him or with doing so] – this is the first point. And if there is permissibility in this matter, then [he asks about] the wording of the supplication. If this (supplicating) is permitted, then if there is a specific wording that you know of, could you advise him on it?

Shaykh: If you go along with the group (or authorities) in principle, and you believe that the problem will be resolved by this supplication, and that there will be no [negative] repercussions from it – meaning, one might fear that this is merely a bait that leads to further demands, and as the saying goes: “The people of Makkah know its paths best,” and “The owner of the house knows best what is within it.” So, if you believe—or rather, to use a more precise expression, if it is your preponderant belief—that the problem will be resolved, and that those lost benefits (of Da‘wah) can be regained by consenting to this bid‘ah (reprehensible innovation – referring to being forced to make a specific Du‘ā’ or the Du‘ā’ itself if it’s problematic), then it may be tolerated. However, if it is as I have conjectured as a possibility—that what follows it will be another demand, and then you will have to submit to a second and a third, and you then become, as al-Ghazālī says in his book, one of the “superficial scholars” (Mashāyikh ar-Rusūm – scholars who are concerned with outward forms rather than substance). Is the answer clear?

Questioner: Yes, it is clear.

Shaykh: Furthermore, if it is the first case (i.e., the problem is resolved by this one act and no further demands are made), your supplication should not contain any [other] violation. Because the violation of this bid‘ah (the coerced supplication or its problematic nature) is enough for us to deal with at present. So, let us not fall into another violation, such as praising a ruler who governs by other than what Allah has revealed. Rather, one should supplicate for his guidance, his success [in doing good], the rectification of his close advisors (biṭānah), and other such sound and permissible meanings. Perhaps I have answered [fully] now as well.

Questioner: Yes.

Shaykh: Al-Ḥamdulillāh (All praise is due to Allah).

(From Silsilah al-Hudā wan-Nūr #580, Question 6)

Source

Attacking rulers from the pulpits and judging them with Kufr and Fusuq without establishing the proof…-Imam Muqbil (rahimahullah)

Question: Is attacking rulers from the pulpits (Minbars) and judging them with Kufr (disbelief) and Fusuq (open sinfulness) without establishing the proof (Hujjah) part of the methodology of the Salaf As-Salih (Pious Predecessors)?

The Answer: The Messenger (SallAllahu ‘alayhi wa ‘ala alihi wa sallam) says: “Whoever among you sees an evil (Munkar), let him change it with his hand; if he is not able, then with his tongue; if he is not able, then with his heart – and that is the weakest of faith.” As for the Hadith: “Whoever has advice for one in authority, let him advise him privately,” indeed, it is a weak (Da’if) Hadith.

The issue of incitement in all countries – we do not want revolutions. We do not want a revolution in Libya; we want Allah to make it easy for a bullet to hit the forehead of Qaddafi – may Allah strike him with calamity! – and for the Libyan people to be relieved of him. We do not want a revolution in Libya, nor do we want a revolution in Iraq – this, by Allah, is my ‘Aqidah (creed) – nor do we want a revolution against the Nusayri Hafiz Al-Assad.

So, the matter of inciting people to rise against the rulers is a matter of foolishness. What happened, my dear brothers, when they killed Sadat? A dog worse than the first dog came. When they killed Sadat – I went down to Egypt during Sadat’s time, Ma sha Allah, we would walk about and the Masjids would be full – may Allah not bless him (Sadat) nor reward him with good, for they wanted to arrest me there – but it was better than the situation that came thereafter.

Therefore, the important point is that revolutions and coups are not to be called for. If a Munkar (reprehensible act) is found, you denounce it. Democracy? You tell them it is Taghut-based (tyrannical/based on false deities). And when the Sana’a government came to the Southerners (South Yemen) and handed them positions, we said to it: “You have erred, O Sana’a government!” And likewise, partisan elections. But we are not callers to revolutions or coups. Rather, even if it were the president and we knew he was calling for bloodshed, we would release tapes against him in refutation of him or others. What good has ever come from revolutions and coups? Afghanistan, which sacrificed – in what was considered a correct Jihad in its initial phase – one and a half million souls, now they fight amongst themselves. And they bring to them Rabbani, in whom is every affliction; and before Rabbani, Sibghatullah Mojaddedi – a Sufi, a Shi’i, an agent of America, in whom is every affliction.

So, the issue is one of Tarbiyah (nurturing and moral upbringing) and Ta’lim (education). And the impetuous, reckless youth must be ‘cooled down.’ If you see an impetuous youth, you give him a ‘cooling tablet,’ cool him down, and calm him. They are the cause of the setbacks for the Da’wahs (Islamic calls).

Thus, the clarification (Bayan) is clear, and denounce the Munkar. But do not call for revolutions and coups.


From the tape: (Al-Ajwibah Al-Hadramiyyah ‘ala Masaa’il Da’awiyyah).

Source

(Translated for academic purposed by Mohammed bin Thajammul Hussain Manna.)